Well, I want to take this on. I've already implemented many of these functions, but they are not neatly implemented, and tied into my personal code at the moment. A spec should help clean things up.
I'll create a Google Doc to collaboratively sketch out aims, an API, put together requirements, and a basic plan for a team and soliciting participation. I'll curate from discussions and what I can find. Is anyone else interested? I'm looking broadly for things like: * specific functions that you think would be valuable * advice on who to talk with * any advice, generally * people who'd be willing to review the sketch API * ... I'm broadly looking for supporters, users, advisers, etc.,. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, <pyt...@bdurham.com> wrote: > Hi Lion, > > I've thought about what you've proposed many times (a Tkinter framework), > but have never had the time to implement it. > > I think all your suggestions are on target. > > Malcolm > > <snipped> > I'm thinking of a module that: > > * supplies functions/tools to examine the widget hierarchy from the shell > * pretty print information about widgets > * wraps event binding and implements a multiplexer, to work around the > widget.unbind(funcid=...) bug, > * wraps idle binding and .after scheduling, so that you can review > bindings (like a task manager), see what's going on, pause/continue > (control) idle executions > * setup Tk & withdraw in 1 call > * return the full path for a widget > * standardize access to the text content of Text, Entry, etc.,. > * ... > * ... (and anything else that makes life with tkinter generally easier) > > Has anyone created such a thing? > > If no one has created one, is there a good reason for that? > </snipped> > > >
_______________________________________________ Tkinter-discuss mailing list Tkinter-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss