Well, I want to take this on.

  I've already implemented many of these functions, but they are not neatly
implemented, and tied into my personal code at the moment.  A spec should
help clean things up.

  I'll create a Google Doc to collaboratively sketch out aims, an API, put
together requirements, and a basic plan for a team and soliciting
participation.  I'll curate from discussions and what I can find.

  Is anyone else interested?

  I'm looking broadly for things like:
  * specific functions that you think would be valuable
  * advice on who to talk with
  * any advice, generally
  * people who'd be willing to review the sketch API
  * ...

  I'm broadly looking for supporters, users, advisers, etc.,.


On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, <pyt...@bdurham.com> wrote:

>  Hi Lion,
>
>  I've thought about what you've proposed many times (a Tkinter framework),
> but have never had the time to implement it.
>
>  I think all your suggestions are on target.
>
>  Malcolm
>
>  <snipped>
>   I'm thinking of a module that:
>
>   * supplies functions/tools to examine the widget hierarchy from the shell
>   * pretty print information about widgets
>   * wraps event binding and implements a multiplexer, to work around the
> widget.unbind(funcid=...) bug,
>   * wraps idle binding and .after scheduling, so that you can review
> bindings (like a task manager), see what's going on, pause/continue
> (control) idle executions
>   * setup Tk & withdraw in 1 call
>   * return the full path for a widget
>   * standardize access to the text content of Text, Entry, etc.,.
>   * ...
>   * ... (and anything else that makes life with tkinter generally easier)
>
>  Has anyone created such a thing?
>
> If no one has created one, is there a good reason for that?
> </snipped>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tkinter-discuss mailing list
Tkinter-discuss@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss

Reply via email to