Hi all !
> On 16 Mar 2016, at 19:49, Colm MacCárthaigh <c...@allcosts.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Paterson, Kenny <kenny.pater...@rhul.ac.uk
> <mailto:kenny.pater...@rhul.ac.uk>> wrote:
> Much better would be implementing an optional padding feature for the AEAD
> modes. Something like this draft proposes:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pironti-tls-length-hiding-02
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pironti-tls-length-hiding-02>
>
> I hadn't seen that! I wonder is there an appetite here for including more
> robust LH in TLS1.2 in some form? I mean a real one; as in - let’s it get it
> into servers and browsers sooner than TLS1.3.
FYI, the experimental length-hiding feature from miTLS described by Alexandre
earlier implements the draft specification linked by Kenny…
Best,
B.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
