On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:51:22 pm Eric Rescorla wrote: > I generally agree with David here. > > -Ekr > > P.S. Back in Seattle, we had rough consensus to change the alert requirements > [0] so that > you didn't have to send alerts, but if you sent an alert, you had to send > alert X. That's been > on the TODO list for a while but expect a PR soon. > > [0] https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/254
I am aware that discussion ended up on accepting sloppy error reporting as acceptable. Changing the disputed missing_extension alerts to SHOULDs would be an acceptable compromise if that decision is still actually going through. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
