On Wednesday 13 July 2016 05:23:53 David Benjamin wrote: > I don't believe an implementation which fails to send supported_groups, > etc., in 1.3 would ever leave a developer's workstation. It would not > interoperate with anything.
it would interoperate with itself, and for some deployments that's enough of a passing grade... (Even if you do interoperatbility testing you do not check all possible permutations of features and settings) I wholeheartedly agree with Dave here, error definitions should be strict (both on the when and what to do). One, because it allows to better diagnose (in general, maybe not in this specific situation) problems. Two, because you can write a strict negative test case that actually checks for it. -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
