Hi Peter,
On 8/30/16, 5:41 AM, "Peter Gutmann" <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote: >David McGrew (mcgrew) <mcg...@cisco.com> writes: > >>See for instance slides 8 and 9 of Daniel Shumow's talk at NIST’s LWC >>workshop last year: >>http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/lwc-workshop2015/presentations/session4-shumow.pdf > >So looking at slide 6 from that, the first four systems he lists are desktop >PCs (in all but form factor), it's only the last two that are down at the >resource levels of IoT. I'm not sure why he picked the Arduinos there because >I wouldn't really consider them terribly representative of IoT devices, was it >to get something that people are familiar with? Even if you're wanting to >restrict yourself to well-known complete systems I think at least an ESP8266 >(80Mhz SoC with 96K RAM, 64K flash, no multiply or divide by default) should >get a mention. > >Slide 9 is even further removed from IoT practicality, that stuff may be fine >on the PC-equivalents but won't work on real IoT gear. > >I'm currently working with some embedded systems guys to come up with a list >of requirements for IoT crypto (as with the TLS-LTS stuff, various IP/legal >issues means many contributors don't want to say anything in public), I'll >post it to the list when we've finished arguing :-). > >Peter. That’s great, facts leaven a debate. thanks David _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
