Eric Mill <e...@konklone.com> writes: >The near-term annoyance of renaming things by folks close to the WG, and the >chance of some confusion around the edges, seem like small issues compared to >a positive investment in bending the sanity curve of the next 20 years of >lazy enterprise decisions.
+1. I was reading an article earlier today on a security web site (not a general news site or even an IT news site but specifically a security web site) where they mentioned that sensitive traffic wasn't SSL-protected. Even the security people are still calling it SSL. So if you number it "4" or "2017" it doesn't matter whether it's SSL or TLS, it's obvious that it's a newer version than anything else out there. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls