Oh, sorry. I missed that it was Informational. In that case there’s just the issue that it has ECDH ciphersuites at a time where 4492bis is deprecating all the other ones. But some of the ciphersuites in there are in wide enough use that it shouldn’t remain Informational.
Yes, it should be uplifted then. Yoav > On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:23, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > This is actually uplift to PS. > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com > <mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:01, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com >> <mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device >> >>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com >>>> <mailto:e...@rtfm.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi folks >>>> >>>> I note that we are proposing to uplift RFC 5289 to PS, despite the fact >>>> that it >>>> standardizes some CBC cipher suites, which the WG is looking to move away >>>> from. I recognize that these are the only cipher suites you can use in TLS >>>> 1.0 >>>> and 1.1, but we also want people to move away from them. >>>> >>>> This problem is probably solvable by marking the registry as Not >>>> Recommended, but I wondered if anyone had other thoughts on this topic? >>>> >>> >>> 5289 applies to TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2. It seems strange to uplift a bunch >>> of ciphersuites for 1.2 just as we’re publishing TLS 1.3 which obsoletes >>> 5246. >> >> TLS 1.2 will be in use for a while unless major problems are found, so it's >> worthwhile IMO. > > I understand that. I’m wondering what message we are trying to convey by > publishing or uplifting a full standard for a now-obsolete protocol. > > The Internet works just fine on proposed standards (or even Internet Drafts) > > Yoav > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
