FWIW, the IETF LC for this has ended now and I plan to send the approval message for the uplift to the secretariat later today.
Thanks, S. On 16/03/17 20:33, Yoav Nir wrote: > Oh, sorry. I missed that it was Informational. > > In that case there’s just the issue that it has ECDH ciphersuites at a time > where 4492bis is deprecating all the other ones. But some of the > ciphersuites in there are in wide enough use that it shouldn’t remain > Informational. > > Yes, it should be uplifted then. > > Yoav > >> On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:23, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: >> >> This is actually uplift to PS. >> >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:01, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device >>> >>>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com >>>>> <mailto:e...@rtfm.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks >>>>> >>>>> I note that we are proposing to uplift RFC 5289 to PS, despite the fact >>>>> that it >>>>> standardizes some CBC cipher suites, which the WG is looking to move away >>>>> from. I recognize that these are the only cipher suites you can use in >>>>> TLS 1.0 >>>>> and 1.1, but we also want people to move away from them. >>>>> >>>>> This problem is probably solvable by marking the registry as Not >>>>> Recommended, but I wondered if anyone had other thoughts on this topic? >>>>> >>>> >>>> 5289 applies to TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2. It seems strange to uplift a bunch >>>> of ciphersuites for 1.2 just as we’re publishing TLS 1.3 which obsoletes >>>> 5246. >>> >>> TLS 1.2 will be in use for a while unless major problems are found, so it's >>> worthwhile IMO. >> >> I understand that. I’m wondering what message we are trying to convey by >> publishing or uplifting a full standard for a now-obsolete protocol. >> >> The Internet works just fine on proposed standards (or even Internet Drafts) >> >> Yoav >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
