Would the Informational track be an acceptable compromise? This does not have to be a product of the TLS working group.
Cheers, Andrei From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 10:17 AM To: Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>; Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>; Matthew Green <matthewdgr...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01 I think there is little doubt that the draft is technically sound. The question is, should the IETF "endorse" this by saying it is a product of the TLS working group? That will certainly send a mixed message to some. As we heard around around Seoul, not adopting might send a message to some industries that we are not interested in helping to solve their problems. It is a fraught issue.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
