On 07/07/17 19:40, Kyle Rose wrote: > an informational draft submitted via the ISE
...has nothing to to with this WG and ought consume no cycles on this list or in meetings. Yes, the ISE is the route 2804 envisages for documenting wiretapping schemes such as this. The authors of this draft however chose to put "standards track" in the header and some of those authors are very very well aware of all the nuances here so that was not a mistake is my conclusion. So I stand by my statement that 2804 says no to this. S.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
