All done, including the PR being merged into the editor's copy. On 29 August 2017 at 00:03, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > It looks like we have consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. > I’ve set up a GH repo in the TLSWG > repo:https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit. > Please submit the current draft as a working group item with the filename > draft-ietf-tls-record-limit. If you can hold off on merging PR#1 until > it’s a WG item, that would be great (i.e., publish then merge). > > Thanks, > > J&S > >> On Aug 4, 2017, at 08:50, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >> >> At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt >> draft-thomson-tls-record-limit [0]. We need to confirm this support on the >> list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft >> and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170818. If you >> object to its adoption, please let us know why. >> >> Cheers, >> >> J&S >> >> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-record-limit/ > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
