On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:15:40PM -0800, Rob Sayre wrote: > If the scope of a document can be continually expanded during last call, it > can be indefinitely postponed.
There is no attempt to postpone, and the WGLC has finished. No new issues will be raised. But the ones that were raised _will_ be addressed. Being left on the rough side of consensus happens; having substantive issues raised in a timely manner ignored must not. The IETF is not a rubber-stamp SDO. We have a process. We don't just pay it lip service. WGLC is not going through the motions. The prescribed process will be followed. Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
