On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:47:57PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:43:36PM -0800, Rob Sayre wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 5:24 PM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 31, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If the scope of a document can be continually expanded during last call, > > > it can be indefinitely postponed. > > > > > > I'm not proposing a change of scope. > > > > > > .... > > > > > The -04 document leaves out a relevant scenario... > > > > > > > That sounds like a change of scope, but reasonable people can disagree. > > The scope was never sufficiently well defined to begin with. I went > through the adoption thread and the WG charter.
Oh, and I'm not conceding that the proposed change would be a scope change even if the scope had been sufficiently well defined. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
