> I agree with Watson's reasoning. Same.
> On Feb 21, 2020, at 2:22 PM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu> > wrote: > > I agree with Watson's reasoning. > > We know now all we need to to start working on generic mechanisms. > > Regards, > Uri > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 21, 2020, at 17:11, Watson Ladd >> <watson=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:08 PM Stephen Farrell >> <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 21/02/2020 22:02, Watson Ladd wrote: >>>> We have already deployed widespread experiments that conducted the >>>> hybridization described in this draft, already have implementations >>>> supporting an approach similar to this draft, and that produced >>>> valuable input to the standardization process. It really didn't matter >>>> that it was SIKE or NewHope that was being hybridized, and they have >>>> very different characteristics. >>> >>> Documented where? >> >> https://blog.cloudflare.com/towards-post-quantum-cryptography-in-tls/ >> https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-tls-post-quantum-experiment/ >> >> This was also presented at the NIST standardization workshop in October of >> 2019. >> >>> >>> Ta, >>> S. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
