> On Sep 18, 2023, at 21:39, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > I wonder if we also need to say something about the ech= SVCB > parameter value 5 that's reserved at [1]? Not sure, but maybe > no harm to make that "official" at the same time if possible. > (There could be current code that assumes that 5 in a wire- > format HTTPS RR value maps to 0xff0d within an ECHConfigList > even if that isn't really right.)
I’ll check with the dnsops chairs. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
