Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> writes: >>On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:30 PM Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> >>wrote: >> >>Absolutely clear. I work with stuff with 20-30 year deployment and life >>cycles. I'm fairly certain TLS 1.2 will still be around when the WebTLS >>world is debating the merits of TLS 1.64 vs. TLS 1.65. > >I have to say, I am skeptical of this claim.
Which one, that there is equipment out there with 20-30 year life cycles or that the WebTLS folks will be arguing over TLS 1.64 in the future? If the latter then it may just be TLS 1.59 at that point, as I said I can't see the future. If the former then I don't really know how to respond to that, are you saying you don't believe that there are systems out there deployed and used with multi-decade life cycles? Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
