On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61) > [0]. We need to start working through these at some point. > > This spreadsheet is probably more useful for people who want to help out, > since only the ADs can really make conclusions as I understand it. (Errata > process doesn't seem to be documented; I'll post to RSWG about that) > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nmuRTV0Fwx-p13AMSV5GMZP5QCn80K0T5Oht5d8Putw/edit#gid=133722335 > > The green color-coding means someone updated the item, IIRC, but I don't > remember the details. > Many of the TLS (RFC 8446) issues have been worked through and resolved in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
