On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> > The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61)
> [0]. We need to start working through these at some point.
>
> This spreadsheet is probably more useful for people who want to help out,
> since only the ADs can really make conclusions as I understand it.  (Errata
> process doesn't seem to be documented; I'll post to RSWG about that)
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nmuRTV0Fwx-p13AMSV5GMZP5QCn80K0T5Oht5d8Putw/edit#gid=133722335
>
> The green color-coding means someone updated the item, IIRC, but I don't
> remember the details.
>

Many of the TLS (RFC 8446) issues have been worked through and resolved in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis/
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to