I support adoption of the draft with or without an applicability statement.
I do not see merit (or even consistency) in the arguments raised about prioritisation or that code points can simply be registered. I also see the arguments that certain individuals don't see a need for this as not at all compelling given that there are more than enough individuals that have voiced a need or desire. Not seeing a need yourself should not act as a blocker where others see a need. The reasons so far seem to distil down to a dislike for the algorithm or dislike for having a choice and concerns that publishing an RFC will encourage adoption. That is the point - there are enough individuals that want to do this and they should have a stable interoperable way to do it. Tim.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
