On 02.10.25 08:57, Bocai Zhou wrote:
I am still missing a good reason for why you will adopt that approach in /your/ draft rather than contributing to /that/ draft, and other ongoing PQ efforts in TLS WG.*About dual chains and draft-yusef*Your correction that I spoke of “two certificates” rather than “two certificate chains” was crucial. Thank you for pointing to draft-yusef-tls-pqt-dual-certs; its structure is indeed more rigorous and better suited for path validation. I will adopt that approach immediately and add proper acknowledgement and citation to that draft and its authors to give them due credit.
-Usama
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
