I support making the experimental code points Recommended=D.

I'm a bit less enthusiastic about switching this document to standards-track
after WGLC to effectuate the change, but it seems like the least bad option
at the moment, so I guess we should go ahead with doing it that way.
If we were at IETF LC it would be a harder decision.

-Ben




________________________________
From: Joseph Salowey <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 11:58 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [TLS] Working group last call for the deprecation experimental code 
points in ECDHE-ML-KEM

Chair review of ECDHE-ML-KEM uncovered the following issue.   The document has 
a section obsoleting the following experimental code points assigned to 
pre-standard versions of ML-KEM (Kyber):  X25519Kyber768Draft00 (25497) and 
SecP256r1Kyber768Draft00
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Chair review of ECDHE-ML-KEM uncovered the following issue.  The document has a 
section obsoleting the following experimental code points assigned to 
pre-standard versions of ML-KEM (Kyber): X25519Kyber768Draft00 (25497) and 
SecP256r1Kyber768Draft00 (25498).  This requires assigning a 'D' to the 
recommended column which requires standards or IESG action.  At the Monday 
afternoon TLS meeting there was strong consensus that the best and quickest way 
forward  to change the document to standards track and make the following 
change to section 6.4 (Obsoleted Supported Groups):

Experimental code points for previous versions of this specification were added 
to the TLS registry as X25519Kyber768Draft00 (25497) and 
SecP256r1Kyber768Draft00 (25498). This document obsoletes these entries. IANA 
is instructed to modify the recommended field to 'D' and update the reference 
to this [ this RFC ].  The comment fields for 25497 and 25498 are updated to 
"obsoleted by [ this RFC ]"

No other registrations are to be modified by this change.

This is a consensus call for this change only as the last call has completed 
for the rest of the document.. Please respond to this thread indicating if you 
support this action by November 14 2025.

Thanks,

Joe, Sean, and Deirdre
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to