This is really silly reason to make the change. Neverless I support it. On Tue, Nov 4, 2025, 11:59 AM Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chair review of ECDHE-ML-KEM uncovered the following issue. The document > has a section obsoleting the following experimental code points assigned to > pre-standard versions of ML-KEM (Kyber): X25519Kyber768Draft00 (25497) and > SecP256r1Kyber768Draft00 (25498). This requires assigning a 'D' to the > recommended column which requires standards or IESG action. At the Monday > afternoon TLS meeting there was strong consensus that the best and quickest > way forward to change the document to standards track and make the > following change to section 6.4 (Obsoleted Supported Groups): > > Experimental code points for previous versions of this specification were >> added to the TLS registry as X25519Kyber768Draft00 (25497) and >> SecP256r1Kyber768Draft00 (25498). This document obsoletes these entries. >> IANA is instructed to modify the recommended field to 'D' and update the >> reference to this [ this RFC ]. The comment fields for 25497 and 25498 are >> updated to "obsoleted by [ this RFC ]" > > > No other registrations are to be modified by this change. > > This is a consensus call for this change only as the last call has > completed for the rest of the document.. Please respond to this thread > indicating if you support this action by November 14 2025. > > Thanks, > > Joe, Sean, and Deirdre > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
