On 27.11.25 01:16, Eric Rescorla wrote:

First, the requirement is not that implementations *use* P-256 but
rather that they implement it.

What's *not* compliant is if you have an implementation which doesn't
support P-256, no matter what other groups it supports.

Thank you for very precise explanations and clear examples. I fully agree that the statement I proposed is not required.

-Usama

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to