* This framing is I think unopinionated to the point of avoding mention of * the specific risks that motivate hybrids, and the need to consider those * risks before choosing a non-hybrid, with a hybrid as the prudent default * choice when in doubt.
Then those arguments should have been made in the hybrid documents. Or Stephen’s proposed draft. I don’t know of any IETF RFC — if you do, please post — that says “here’s how to do something, but don’t do it if xxxx yyy or zzz.”
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
