Daniel Apon <[email protected]> writes: >That's certainly a fantastically interesting paper, but I don't think >vulnerabilities in publicly available QC simulation infrastructure has >anything to do with the need for adoption of PQC.
Sure, that's why I said: So while the PQ crypto may not necessarily make you vulnerable, the tools to play with it certainly do. I was pointing out that there are problems in the QC ecosystem. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
