Hi Stephen,
On 4/28/26 23:24, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 28/04/2026 21:24, Sean Turner wrote:
Hi! The chairs have judged that there is consensus to progress this
I-D.
Well, that's a terse summary of a surprising conclusion. (And not
even 'rough'?)
Indeed.
I think it'd be good to understand the chairs' reasoning as to why
the various objections have been sufficiently deal with.
We probably agree in that it would be positive to better understand the
chairs' reasoning about objections as well as other factors that led to
that mistake of process.
Given the unmerged change discovery post-consensus call and the
subsequent discussion around it, vacating the consensus seems easier and
faster from a procedural point of view.
Kind regards,
Jacob Appelbaum
Cheers,
S.
We will work with the authors to get a new version submitted
and we will get to work on the Shepherd Write-Up.
The Chairs, Deirdre, Joe, and Sean
On Apr 9, 2026, at 15:30, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
This is the working group last call for Use of ML-DSA in TLS 1.3.
Please review draft-ietf-tls-mldsa [1] and reply to this thread
indicating if you think it is ready for publication or not. If you
do not think it is ready please indicate why. This call will end
on April 23, 2026.
REMINDER: If you have not done so recently, review the TLS WG's
Mail List Procedures; see [2].
The Chairs, Deirdre, Joe, and Sean
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mldsa/ [2]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/
ucdImHExlbOf4Q3BCG81gjzi2xE/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list --
[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
