On Thursday, Dec 4, 2003, at 11:53 US/Mountain, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
All the above is just to say "I don't know" to your question above. I hope I haven't muddied the waters too much with this other issue
Let's deal with one issue at a time here.
Comment out the 'drop' line or do whatever you have to do to receive the confirmation message, and then reply to it, and see if it produces the same results as with tmda-cgi (the wrong address being appended to CONFIRM_APPEND). _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
Sorry for being dense. I should have done this automatically.
I commented out the drop line, sent a mail to tmdatest, replied to the confirmation message and voila!
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:57:25 MST 2003
XPri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Test message without bounce drop
Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (864)
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:57:25 MST 2003
XPri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Test message without bounce drop
Actn: CONFIRM pending 1070564267.6298.msg (864)
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:59:20 MST 2003
XPri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rept: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj:
Actn: CONFIRM accept 1070564267.6298.msg (961)
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:59:20 MST 2003
XPri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rept: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj:
Actn: CONFIRM_APPEND /home/tmdatest/.tmda/lists/whitelist (961)
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:59:27 MST 2003
XPri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Test message without bounce drop
Actn: OK good_confirm_done_cookie (1066)
The correct address IS appended to the tmdatest whitelist:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cat .tmda/lists/whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, what I've been seeing is the drop from [EMAIL PROTECTED] rule forcing release through TMDA-cgi and that is what's causing the dated addresses to be inserted in the whitelists?
Would it maybe be a better idea to use a different "drop" address for each user? Just thinking as I write here, I'm wondering if I used a drop rule based on each individual's e-mail address? I already (as do you) tell people not to whitelist their own e-mail address. I wonder how much of a problem it would be to use
BOUNCE_ENV_SENDER = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] dropin my individual config file? I can pretty easily modify my new_user script to do this, if it is a workable idea.
Thanks again, Jason!
Jeff
-- Jeff Ross Open Vistas Networking, Inc. http://www.openvistas.net _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
