On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:50:47PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > So, I was thinking about starting a repository for these patches. > Initially, this will just be a collection of contributed patches and > nothing more.
I was thinking along the same lines myself; I just haven't gotten around to dedicating a box to it yet. My personal preference is for a wiki, because without some documentation and explaination, most patches are pretty incomprehensible even for the average programmer. Qmail has been maintained in a similar fashion for many years, due to the inability to redistribute a modified source tree. So, there's no reason TMDA couldn't exist forever without a new fork, although that might be necessary somewhere down the line if the list of non-discretionary patches gets too large. I've been trying to take a bigger hand in bug-hunting and feature patches, but I personally have no desire at this time to maintain the code base. So unless someone else does, I think the patch wiki is the current best way forward. If no one else does it before then, I'll probably slap something wiki-ish (and therefore more or less self-maintaining) together on a forthcoming CodeGnome web server. -- Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/ _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
