It might be better to make a tmda2 project at SF.

I have asked SF support what happens to projects like this and asked if we could get developers added

We'll see what they say

tom
----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Setting up a TMDA patch repository



On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:50:47PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:

So, I was thinking about starting a repository for these patches.
Initially, this will just be a collection of contributed patches and
nothing more.

I was thinking along the same lines myself; I just haven't gotten around to dedicating a box to it yet. My personal preference is for a wiki, because without some documentation and explaination, most patches are pretty incomprehensible even for the average programmer.

Qmail has been maintained in a similar fashion for many years, due to
the inability to redistribute a modified source tree. So, there's no
reason TMDA couldn't exist forever without a new fork, although that
might be necessary somewhere down the line if the list of
non-discretionary patches gets too large.

I've been trying to take a bigger hand in bug-hunting and feature
patches, but I personally have no desire at this time to maintain the
code base. So unless someone else does, I think the patch wiki is the
current best way forward.

If no one else does it before then, I'll probably slap something
wiki-ish (and therefore more or less self-maintaining) together on a
forthcoming CodeGnome web server.

--
Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users


_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to