On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:18:52PM -0500, Alfred Ganz wrote: > what is the rational, if this isn't an spurious behavior, for the > arbitrary removal of header lines for the remaining unfiltered > recipients?
My educated guess is that if you are using dated or keyword addresses, you may not want all recipients to receive the keys to the kingdom, as it were. I haven't really seen the behavior you're talking about, though, so it's just a reasoned assumption. You'll have to post some specific examples if you want me to take a closer look. > is there a way to preserve the header lines in question for recipients > that are processed after the filtered one? If your outgoing filter uses "to," then it's my understanding that it will replace those addresses accordingly, and use the default action on any others unless you use "X-TMDA: bare" to bypass it. -- Re-Interpreting Historic Miracles with SED #141: %s/water/wine/g _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
