Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Granted, but tmda should point out this limitation since it doesn't > have a workaround for it.
I didn't realize anyone used NIS any longer. This is the first time in 5 years I can remember anyone bringing this up actually. > At least the pending messsages go in the right directory now. > However, on a 1 GHz machine it takes several seconds to process a 2 > line message. I am a bit concerned about performance as our > mailserver processes hundreds of thousands of messages daily. > Python reads a ton of junk before it starts to do anything. Something is wrong, as that sort of delay is not typical. There are sites running TMDA on servers that process as much or more mail than this, but obviously I'd recommend several layers of spam defense before TMDA. TMDA should generally be placed near the end of the spam-processing sequence to reduce the number of challenges being sent out. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
