I'm running sendmail.
Brent Spencer XsiteDesigns > On Tue, February 26, 2008 4:38 pm, Brent Spencer wrote: >> Stephen, >> >> Seems that using a dated address at all isn't recommended as you don't >> know whether the remote SMTP server will be using SAV or not. That >> would >> mean that the proper handling of bounces as shown below would no longer >> work. >> >> # Catch-all rule for addresses that are not yet on the whitelist. >> # Use a dated envelope (to catch bounces), a dated Reply-To for safe >> # measure, and also append the recipient's address to the whitelist. >> #to-file ~/.tmda/whitelist bare >> to * tag envelope dated=10d reply-to dated from bare=append > > I've never actually had problems with somebody denying my dated addresses > due to SAV, that I know of. > > That said, I think the way postfix (which I use) handles address > validation, extensions are ignored, so my server does actually allow a > remote SMTP server using SAV to work correctly... > > Thinking about it, the same should be true of any SMTP server where the > server itself supports address extensions. What SMTP server are you > running? > > (This email has been scanned for viruses by ClamAV) > > (This email has been scanned for viruses by ClamAV) _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list (tmda-users@tmda.net) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
