That would be me Frank With more than one attack but no lesions on the brain or other MS indicators, people are then diagnosed with recurrent TM.
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Barbara H. <barbara...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Barbara H. <barbara...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [TMIC] Linda's "recurrent TM" To: fr...@franksheldon.com Cc: "Regina Rummel" <regina...@sbcglobal.net>, tmic-list@eskimo.com Date: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 2:58 PM No, it is not correct, according to the articles I quoted earlier and according to the experience of several people here.. Some people have more than one attack without having further symptoms of MS. A second attack indicates MS is a strong possibility, but it isn't always MS. With more than one attack but no lesions on the brain or other MS indicators, people are then diagnosed with recurrent TM. Barbara H. http://barbarah.wordpress.com On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM, <fr...@franksheldon.com> wrote: Frank explained some time ago that one occurrence is TM, the second one indicates MS. Perhaps I misunderstood. Yes, That is exactly correct F
