On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:05:27PM +0000, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:59:44PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I'm lost; what options would it rotate through, exactly, and how > > would that be determined? > > Eg mode-keys has options "vi" and "emacs", "setw mode-keys" w/o a > value could rotate through them. > > Any new options could work similarly. > > Or are you thinking of for user-defined option values?
That's exactly what I was thinking, yes. (In the case of Micah's solution it would be bindings anyways, but that's beside the point). -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
