> > > Or are you thinking of creating the table after running the set command? > > > This shouldn't work - you shouldn't be able to set a client to a > > > nonexistent table. > > > > I guess I don't super care what happens since I won't personally be > > writing any switch-client -T into an empty table but I had assumed we > > would allow switching to a new [and ephemeral] table since otherwise > > switch-client -T can fail which just seems weird to me. > > I'd say it should fail if the table doesn't exist. > > I can't think of a case where I would want it to automatically create a > table, except to confuse people who make a typo in the table name. Do > you have a use in mind?
Not specifically, I just prefer to see tools degrade what might be described as "uniformly" where possible. Nonuniform behaviour makes tools dangerous for automated use because when writing a script you're unlikely to think of things like "what if this table is empty" or "what if this command barfs on no args when really no args means I just didn't need it to do anything". I'll switch it and the next set of patches will be up shortly. Keith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
