Thanks John for this note. This sets aside
my primary concern and am also thinking of adding DCC
and Pyzor too. Best regards, Neil -----Original
Message----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I’m just fishing for comments on the pros or cons with
simscan plus spamassassin with razor2. I have just finished a toaster install
and also placed razor2 on top of the standard spamassassin, everything is
working like a charm … kudos to Bill for such a wonderful patch. Anybody
got ideas on how this setup would fair on a moderately loaded server? I’m
just wondering what’s the effect of this setup to the delay introduced
into the smtp negotiation. I'm running SA with
Razor2 using SimScan, much faster than the qmail-scanner method. So far I
haven't seen any issues with it, one busy box is a MTA for a 1400 user ISP
which has existed in 1996 and gets quite a load of incoming email connections,
handles it fine now and runs better than it did when it was qmail-scanner
based. -- Dynanet Network Services Toll-Free: (866) 752-8866 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dynanet.ca/
|
- [toaster] Razor2 and Simscan neil
- Re: [toaster] Razor2 and Simscan John Melville
- Re: [toaster] Razor2 and Simscan Neil
- Re: [toaster] Razor2 and Simscan John Melville