Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 12/19/2000 10:48 AM, "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If Tomcat 3.3 can prove it is as stable as Tomcat 3.2.x and is
>> more spec compliant than 3.2.x,
>
> Why does it have to be called Tomcat 3.3?
> Why not Tomcat 3.2.x+1?
Because it's architecture is so much different from 3.2 :)
>> I think it would be a disservice to not release it as the final RI for
>> Servlet
>> 2.2/JSP 1.1.
>
> I'm not suggesting that we not release it.
If the architecture doesn't change, neither do I :)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli <http://www.betaversion.org/> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
