Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 02:59 PM 1/19/2001 -0800 >> So what do we need a 4.1 branch for then? > >If we take the action Remy recommends, we won't. I'm +1 for this OK, I understand the motivations for this. When/how do you think the PersistentManager code I submitted last week should be integrated? I hate to put more untried code into 4.0, but I'd really like to see it committed somewhere where people can try it and I can build onto it. I have a number of things I'd like discuss doing with the session classes, like refactoring StandardSession into an abstract class and implementing the locking/request completion stuff we've discussed here. Kief --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change... Remy Maucherat
- sendRedirect, include and forward don... Filip Hanik
- Re: sendRedirect, include and fo... Dan Milstein
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Filip Hanik
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Dan Milstein
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Filip Hanik
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Filip Hanik
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Hans Bergsten
- Re: sendRedirect, include an... Filip Hanik
- welcome-file Jayesh
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change... Kief Morris
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Ch... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta A... Kief Morris
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta A... Marc Saegesser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change: Securi... Jason Brittain
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change: Security Ma... Kief Morris
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change: Security Ma... Glenn Nielsen