On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote: > The above paragraph describes a 'fundamental issue' > that has absolutely nothing to do with the Java Server > Pages specification and, rather, entirely to do with a > particular implementation of the specification. As And most of the other arguments are in the same category - bad implementation of the spec. So we need to fix it :-) After all that's one of the diferences between the zillion templating systems and jsp - a spec with a wide variety of implementations that improve. I do agree with some of Jon's arguments - the spec is not perfect ( but I don't think HTTP spec is perfect either, or HTML or XSLT or even the servlet spec - and for many of those I could list more serious reasons for not using them and choosing a random alternative :-). Costin
- [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source code by URL tric... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source code by... Jon Stevens
- Re: [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source cod... Daniel Lopez
- Re: [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source... Brad Cox
- "Just say no to JSP" Re: [F... Jon Stevens
- Re: "Just say no to JSP&quo... Brad Cox
- Re: "Just say no to JSP... Earl . Stutes
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... Nick Bauman
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... Mel Martinez
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... cmanolache
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... Jon Stevens
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... cmanolache
- RE: 'Just say no to JSP'... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP' Earl . Stutes
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP' Jon Stevens
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP' Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: 'Just say no to JSP' Paulo Gaspar
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP' Paul Speed
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... Jon Stevens
- Re: 'Just say no to JSP'... Mel Martinez