> Things To Do before we decide on format or CVS:
>
> * Look at the latest TOC and make comments
>
> * Pick a section or subsection and start writing :-)
>
> * Look at http://tomcatbook.sourceforge.net/ and
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tcbook and see if there's anyone there to
> recruit, or if effort is being duplicated
Sounds good to me. That latest TOC is even more mind-blowing than the first
one. I think you're *really* scaring people off =)
> I like this compromise. I will propose that we get rid of the 3.2 docs
> on the site -- once I'm convinced they're similar enough. There's still
> that old "3.3 is a rogue release" sentiment floating around, and people
> might not appreciate giving 3.3 implied legitimacy by making it the
> "official" documentation...
Woah, I thought the committers worked that out a long time ago. Well, I
don't want to open any cans of worms so AFAIC, the TC3 doc people can do
what they want (of course), although I don't think maintaining 2 sets of
docs is expected, a good idea, or will even happen =)
> Good point. I'm for Anakia plus a stylebook saying which HTML tags and
> tricks are approved (like, stay away from JavaScript :-)
OMG! +111111111 (re: JavaScript)
> No, I think we're making progress.
As far as the TOC is concerned, agreed.
- r
