> Unless and until there's a 3.3 or 4.0 final release, *3.2* is the "latest > Tomcat release", and deserves to be documented on the web site. Ah, but that's exactly my point. I see two versions of Tomcat docs up there now and I'm like, "wtf?" Why have the 3.3 docs online then? Now that I've RTFM, I'm enlightened. So what I'm saying is this: once 3.3 is final then we aren't expected to update the 3.2.x docs. The 3.2.x docs become the 3.3 docs after modification - we don't have to maintain a version 3.2.x docs. This is my take on Alex's question of "should we maintain separate versions of the doc for older versions?" So when 4.1 comes out, do we maintain 4.0 documentation, or does it become 4.1 documentation? My opinion is the latter... - r
- RE: [DOC]: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Rob S.
- AW: [DOC]: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Thomas Bezdicek
- Re: [DOC]: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Alex Chaffee
- Re: [DOC]: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [DOC]: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Jon Stevens
- RE: Re: Vote on oustanding doc issues? Rob S.
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Alex Chaffee
- RE: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Rob S.
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Alex Chaffee
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Rob S.
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Alex Chaffee
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Adam Fowler
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [DOC] Vote on oustanding doc issues? Adam Fowler
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project... Aaron Bannert
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project... Aaron Bannert
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WA... guru
- Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project... Craig R. McClanahan