Re: Separating Service code from Tomcat 4.0

[Pier P. Fumagalli]

Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> So far, commons is 100% Java, but I don't believe they (really we, cause
> I'm a committer there :-) would be opposed to a commonly useful project
> that has native code components.

Dunno...

>> jakarta-tomcat-connectors is a place where C and Java are mixed ;-)
>> What about jakarta-tomcat-connectors/service?
> 
> Except for the fact that it's not a connector, and has nothing really to
> do with Tomcat :-)

Exactly...

> If we stay under Tomcat auspices, I'd vote for jakarta-tomcat-service
> instead.

I'd say, let's stick it with Tomcat until we don't have a "proof-of-concept"
that it works, and then we can decide... I like jakarta-tomcat-service.

    Pier