> For Tomcat 4, what do folks think of omitting the sources from the binary > distribution? This would knock the size of the binary distributions down > by around 2 megabytes (which I'm sure people would also appreciate). ...exactly why I emailed about it in the first place =) I have an old laptop with a paltry 2GB HD and with Windows, every OUNCE of space I can free up is worth it. Also, I think 3.x still includes them and I'm kind of surprised to see "src" in there. Whenever I want to see src, I always go to web cvs anyways. I think it's good to have the source for the version you're running if you ever need to snoop around, but we could save the world some bandwidth and time for the very few instances this occurs =) - r
- Sources in Binary Distributions Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Christopher Cain
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Bip Thelin
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Bip Thelin
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Christopher Cain
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Rob S.
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Kevin Seguin
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Fabien Le Floc'h
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Christopher Cain
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Andy Armstrong
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Arun Katkere
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Remy Maucherat
- RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Arun Katkere
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Christopher Cain
- Re: Sources in Binary Distributions Christopher Cain