Larry,

I will have ironed out the final bugs by Wed/Thur and will submit the code
for committing. Until then there is a patch for jk_nt_service that is
complete, if that could be committed then the Service Manager could even be
released separately. I have attached that patch. On your list of criteria:
1. It looks nice?!?! (Although it could do with better icons). Allows
monitoring of local/remote Tomcat services.
2. It runs completely separate from TC. It just looks at the services.
3. As 2.
4. Sure I can do that.
5. I think it's fairly self explanatory. People used to Windows shouldn't
have a problem. Plus I keep an eye on the list quite a bit so I can answer
any queries.
6. I will get it ready for commit.

Plus sorry for any duplicate messages. I had problems posting to the list :)

Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2001 16:08
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: NT Service Manager

Hi David,

I'll be glad to consider it.  My criteria for including a usability
enhancement, prior to Release Candidate 2 is:

1. Offers a real benefit.
2. It's impact is *easy* to evaluate.
3. It won't impact the stability of Tomcat 3.3.
4. It is, or can be, sufficiently documented.
5. It won't generate more tomcat-user traffic than it's worth!
6. There is time to commit it.

The last one may push some desirable features into a later
Tomcat 3.3 release, which I expect will happen.  Tomcat 3.3
can't release unless there are enough committers to continue
support.  I'm still willing to consider simple usability
enhancements, time permitting :-), and not rule them out absolutely
at this point.

Cheers,
Larry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Oxley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:18 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: NT Service Manager
>
>
> Larry and all,
>
> I am writing a service manager based on the UI of SQLServer's Service
> Manager. It is nearly finished and I am aiming to finish it before the
> release of TC3.3. If anyone is interested in this, please
> give it a go and
> give me some feedback. Larry, is it to late for TC3.3 (assuming you're
> interested in it anyway!).
>
> I have attached the current source code. It relies on an
> updated version of
> jk_nt_service.exe for which I have also supplied a patch. I
> will be doing a
> patch to get it working for TC4, but as TC4rc1 is out it is
> probably to late
> for that.
>
> Both attachments are in service.zip.
>
> If anyone wants me to send them the binaries, just say. I
> think it's too big
> for the list.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

ntservice.diff

Reply via email to