On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Excellent, we should give a way to user to fall back to OS calls if they > > could find an APR installed. > > I am not sure about that, APR should hide all OS calls. Mixing APR and OS calls > is possible but probably not very safe.
Not mixing - just keeping the current ( unportable ) code around for a while and using it when APR is not available ( using #ifdefs ). If APR is detected by the build system it'll be used and the old code will not. If for some reasons APR is not detected or disabled - the old code will provide the basic functionality ( a socket channel, AJP1x, etc ). > > A question for people with old make tool, no more a problem > > for Linux/xxBSD users. What about Solaris, AIX and HP/UX ? > > I have some problems of ReliantUnix with VPATH. The other thing I do not like > with VPATH is that the *.o files are in one place and the sources in another > one... For the first - is ReliandUnix using Gnu make ( of a recent version ) ? The code should be the same. For the second - java does the same with the classes, I thought most people would like it :-) It allows us to build common with some options for apache2 and other options ( defines, flags, etc ) for apache13 or iis. The .o files for the 2 servers will be in separated dirs. ( right now jkant is doing that, but it's easy to change ) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
