>> No, I am not using a Gnu make - But I will: you convince me :) > >Would it be ok if we make Gnu make a requirement for the build system ? >There are many cool feature that would make building much easier ( >patterns, globs, etc ).
+1, even AS/400 has a gnu make :) >After we start using APR I see very little benefit in using >much configure >- in fact we must make sure our code is platform independent. Ant + a >simple gnumakefile should satisfy anyone's taste. What about autoconf stuff ? >BTW, could you help me with a small test 'apr channel' for unix-domain >sockets ? I can do the java side ( and the JNI ), but it would >help a lot if an apr expert could be around :-) >( or at least a reimplementation of jk_channel_socket using apr, but >that woulnd't bring anything new ). I want to test the new build system >and get things started on the jni side ( most of the APR features will >need jni code to be useable for connector - we need both sides of the >channel ) JF is your man for that task... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
