What about mod_webapp SNAPSHOT for this release ?

Will you include the latest stuff from JTC CVS ?

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 Release Plan
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I think it's the appropriate time to consider starting a new 
>release cycle
>for
>Tomcat 4.0. There has been a variety of significant bugs fixed 
>since 4.0.1
>(although there hasn't been any fixes for any showstopper bug).
>
>I don't plan to propose a formal release plan for this 
>release, as it is a
>bugfix-only release, and it will be released as soon as there 
>are no more
>must-fix issues remaining in the most current release candidate.
>
>- A few more code merge will happen between now and the first 
>beta release
>  (at least one to add JAVA_HOME support in the install script).
>- The release notes will document all the fixes which occured 
>since 4.0.1.
>- The release notes will list the must-fix bugs. This 
>generally includes
>bugs
>  whose severity in Bugzilla is 'blocker' (P1), 'critical' (P2)
>  or 'major' (P3).
>- Tomcat 4.0.2 won't have any regressions over 4.0.1.
>- All betas for 4.0.2 should be considered release candidates if the
>must-fix
>  issues list is empty.
>- Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1 should be released between 12/02 and 12/16.
>- This vote will run until 12/01.
>
><ballot>
>[ ] +1: I approve this plan, and I'll help
>[ ] +0: I approve this plan
>[ ] -0: I'm against this plan, but I won't veto it
>[ ] -1: I'm against this plan, and my reason is:
>
>
></ballot>
>
>Remy
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to