Patrick Luby wrote: > > Remy, > > This is great news! > > I scanned through the Unix code and noticed that it uses the chmod'ing > executables with setuid bits instead of performing a JNI call to the setuid() > and seteuid() C functions before and after binding of a ServerSocket (i.e. the > place you should need root access if you are binding to ports 1 through 1024). > This type of approach eliminates the need for a controller and slave process. > > If there is interest out there, I can work up a proposal for implementing this > type of setuid functionality. I has been a year or two since I did my last JNI > coding, but I should be able to dig up some setuid code that I have done in the past. >
There is interest out there! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
