> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > > Now if we could just make the code common to 3.3/4.0. :( > > I think that we'll probably have to review the tomcat_util.jar policies in > > 3.3.2 now that more people are likely to start using modules from j-t-c. > > What about removing the tomcat_util from 3.3 tree, and keeping a single > copy in j-t-c ? > > As long as tomcat_util.jar is backward compatibile it is possible to > use new modules with any 3.3.x - by upgrading the jar with the newer > version. > > Larry - would you be comfortable with this ? It's much easier than > duplicating each change in 2 trees ( especially since Remy may be > uncomfortable updating the changes in 3.3 tree :-).
I didn't know I was supposed to keep them in sync ;-) I noticed it was a very bad idea to keep duplicated sources, so +1 for removing the duplication. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>