> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > Now if we could just make the code common to 3.3/4.0. :(
> > I think that we'll probably have to review the tomcat_util.jar policies
in
> > 3.3.2 now that more people are likely to start using modules from j-t-c.
>
> What about removing the tomcat_util from 3.3 tree, and keeping a single
> copy in j-t-c ?
>
> As long as tomcat_util.jar is backward compatibile it is possible to
> use new modules with any 3.3.x - by upgrading the jar with the newer
> version.
>
> Larry - would you be comfortable with this ? It's much easier than
> duplicating each change in 2 trees ( especially since Remy may be
> uncomfortable updating the changes in 3.3 tree :-).

I didn't know I was supposed to keep them in sync ;-)

I noticed it was a very bad idea to keep duplicated sources, so +1 for
removing the duplication.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to