I prefer not to move tomcat_util to J-T-C until after Tomcat 3.3.1, which I plan on getting out this week or weekend at the latest. After that, I'm +1.
Cheers, Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:10 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/htt > p MimeHeaders.java > > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > > > > Now if we could just make the code common to 3.3/4.0. :( > > > I think that we'll probably have to review the tomcat_util.jar > > > policies > in > > > 3.3.2 now that more people are likely to start using modules from > > > j-t-c. > > > > What about removing the tomcat_util from 3.3 tree, and keeping a > > single copy in j-t-c ? > > > > As long as tomcat_util.jar is backward compatibile it is > possible to > > use new modules with any 3.3.x - by upgrading the jar with > the newer > > version. > > > > Larry - would you be comfortable with this ? It's much easier than > > duplicating each change in 2 trees ( especially since Remy may be > > uncomfortable updating the changes in 3.3 tree :-). > > I didn't know I was supposed to keep them in sync ;-) > > I noticed it was a very bad idea to keep duplicated sources, > so +1 for removing the duplication. > > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:tomcat-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
