"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > By "pluggable security implementations", I assume you really mean
> > pluggable SSL implementations? I'd certainly be +1 if someone wanted to
> > tackle porting the changes that were made in 3.3 to make this pluggable.
> >
>
> AFAIK, Eric wanted to get to this at one point (and who could be better
> qualified :). I think that it will be easier to do this in Coyote than the
> current Http11Connector.
Yeah, at one point is about right. I'm a little swamped right now, so
I couldn't do any more than a rush job--always a dangerous practice on
security critical code. I'll be happy to offer advice and review
if someone else wants to take a shot at it. Alternately, if someone
can commit to giving my code a thorough review, I'll take a crack
at it myself.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.rtfm.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
